Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been achieved, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all be certain regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair into the offender as well as the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary for the determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may possibly seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Although there is no prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds small sway. Still, if there is not any precedent from the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may be regarded through the court.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically cause exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service check here based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not influence the department of his/her innocence.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of the boy or Woman will not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is actually a legislation that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, instead than legislation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service of your grievance notice is often a mandatory requirement as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation necessitates that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Therefore, this petition is admissible based on recognized court precedents, plus the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
Summaries of cases that form the lives of youthful individuals, guaranteeing a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fanatics alike.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could possibly be one particular or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason to the decision in the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could possibly be adopted in an argument.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance to your party’s argument, or to guide the present court.